The Six Deadliest Words

Imagine yourself in the waiting room ahead of a meeting with the key legislator you need to advance your agenda. You’ve spent days, maybe weeks, gathering the data, building your narrative, rehearsing your talking points. Your feet are a little sore because you’ve been walking the halls all day from meeting to meeting, getting into your rhythm ahead of this, the big one.

At that point, there’s almost nothing more you can do. Just like cramming for tests in school, at some point you already know all that you’re going to know. You’re better off shutting down, thinking about something else and clearing your mind of the stressors leading into your day of advocacy.

But no matter how much you know, how firm your personal relationship with that decision maker, or how timely your request, there are six words that are going to sink your agenda.

“I haven’t heard from any constituents.”

There it is. You’re sunk. And if you think your organization’s system is immune to this poison pill, you are gravely mistaken. I’ve seen multiple legislators drop this nugget on fortune 500 companies just the same as small, community based non-profits. There has even been a time or two that I’ve had to deliver those words of reproach.

Advocates and lobbyists invest incredible amounts of time into relationship building. If you’re new to this blog, I’ve tried to raise this concept over multiple posts, and I’d encourage you to read through a few of them (maybe start here). But the concept is simple: it takes time and concerted effort to build a level of trust with any decision maker.

All of that work will fall apart when it runs into the reality that all politics is local. A member of congress, a state legislator, a governor – all are inclined to determine whether a given measure will mean anything to the voters back home. Failing to account for this reality within your advocacy plan is the sure fire way to cripple your agenda.

But what does that look like?

Over the next two months, my Thursday posts are going to revolve around developing political action plans. I hope to layer concepts together such as activating your grassroots team, leveraging existing events, PAC activity and others to show how you can build a strategic agenda that exists outside of the topsy-turvy world of daily political gamesmanship.

The goal is pretty simple – most organizations need to transition from a reactionary mindset to a proactive one. By properly weaving together your various political activities, you can prevent yourself from walking into a meeting already doomed by those six deadliest words. More importantly, you’ll be able to advance your agenda in the midst of political turmoil.

On a more personal note, I’m also going to work toward delivering content to you in some new ways. I’m much more comfortable with the written word, but, I want to continually develop this blog into greater relevancy to you. So – help me out if you can. Drop me a line, in the comments below or via email to luke@partofthepossible.com, and let me know what topics you’re most interested in having me explore, as well as what mediums (audio files, short videos, etc.) you’d benefit from most. I’m excited to stretch myself in new ways, but I want the content to add value to your life and work.

I continue to be floored, and absolutely grateful, by the number of folks who check in with me here on the blog. Thank you for sharing your thoughts, and your precious time with me. I’m excited to keep growing with you as we try, together, to be part of the possible.

We will have our cake

One aspect of my life that I’ve yet to share much about on this platform is my time in uniform as a commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps.

From 2007-2011, I served as a lieutenant – leading Marines as part of the 3rd Battalion of the 2nd Marine Regiment (3/2) stationed in North Carolina. Simply put, joining the ranks of these Marines remains the watershed moment of my personal and professional development.

Growing up in Ohio, one is likely to develop a certain set of midwestern sensibilities. One of those, is that each of us, in our own way, owes a debt of service to our nation. For most, that does not mean joining the military. Service will take many forms, but I would venture to say that we all feel that pressing call to do something in our lives that exists beyond ourselves, something larger, that we are willing to place ahead of our own interest.

Until I was a senior in college, I’d successfully dodged that pressure – but then it hit me like a freight train. Here I was, a year from entering the “real world” and I had absolutely no idea how I wanted to start my career. Then my dad said something profound.

Knowing full well that I wanted to, someday, be involved in political work my dad said something that you can probably hear slipping from the tongue of your own father figure: “if you’re going to serve, you’d better serve first.”

That was pretty stunning advice from my father when our nation was in the midst of what would become its longest war ever. Further, it carried the weight of my father’s own regrets over having not been able to serve during his generation’s conflict. Immediately I knew he was right, but I didn’t know just what I wanted to do.

But, the seed was planted and I ravenously dove into studying the branches and their cultures – and it became clear almost immediately that I wanted a special challenge: to earn the title of Marine. I knew that challenge alone would satisfy the intensifying desire I felt to push myself while also repaying my own debt to our society.

I didn’t know at the time the fully immersive nature of becoming a Marine. It changes you in ways that long outlive your time in uniform. And the most important aspect of that evolution, is that you will always carry with you a pride in the shared history of our beloved Corps.

Today, November 10th, 2020 is the 245th birthday of our Corps. In any other year, we’d gather, both those in uniform and those no longer in service, to raise a glass in honor of that history. We’d share stories from generations past, celebrate our own experiences, and take a moment to remember our fallen. Like so much of 2020, that celebration has become, well, muted.

Wondering how I could still share some of our uniquely Marine esprit de corps, I stumbled onto an idea that I hope you’ll enjoy. Sunday night, I reached out to Marines across my social media network and asked them to join me in a small project: reading the annual birthday message – a message originally written by our 13th Commandant, General John A. LeJeune in 1921. As part of our yearly celebrations, this message is read with great pomp and circumstance. This year, a bunch of us who have worn the uniform are going for a more casual experience.

I hope you’ll enjoy hearing from some of my fellow Devil Dogs in this video. It was a quick project, and my first ever attempt at anything like editing a video. Watch it more than once so you can really listen to the poetic nature of General LeJeune’s message. Whether you’ve carried the mantle of the “few and the proud” or not, I think you’ll experience one aspect of our history that will help you further appreciate those carrying on the Corps’ mission today.

Our birthday is special to us. Coupled with Veterans Day on the 11th, this time of year stands out to Marines. I hope, as you go about your day you’ll take time to think of our Leathernecks across the globe and thank our brothers and sisters from the other branches as well.

With so much that has divided us in recent months, celebrating the service of those who’ve answered that call to serve beyond their own interests may just be the tonic we need to move beyond the rhetoric. Maybe, just maybe, it will also help us start looking forward to what is possible in the days ahead.

In celebration of our 245th Birthday

BUT WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?!?!?!?!?!

Frankly, we just don’t know. Kind of.

For the last 24 hours, pundits have been filling open air with an irrepressible stream of conjecture. The cumulative effect of all this speculation is a growing sense of angst over what direction we’re heading in as a country.

Unfortunately, there’s not a clear answer. And that’s not because we are waiting on a firm announcement of a President-elect. Rather, it revolves around the mixed nature of the results altogether.

With so much attention paid to the Presidential contest, I would argue average citizens are unaware of the divided legislature coming their way.

It seems likely, at this point, that Republicans will maintain control of the US Senate. And while Democrats are poised to maintain the gavel in the US House of Representatives, they did not realize their hopes to grow their existing House majority. This projected divide in congress, paired with the new philosophical breakdown of the Supreme Court will continue the existing challenge facing advocates today.

Divided government is not, in and of itself, a bad thing. By design, our constitutional design forces divided governments into a system that requires compromise and incremental approaches to solving problems.

The natural friction of our system will prevent sweeping changes from any new executive administration. You are likely to see continued expansion of the use of executive orders, which are limited in their effectiveness. However, you are also likely to see an increased utilization of the federal rule making process that lies outside of the role of the legislature. That dynamic is the ultimate threat to your advocacy agenda moving forward.

Under the Administrative Procedures Act of 1974, Congress divested itself of a significant portion of its ability to set national policy. By deferring to administrative pathways, the legislature allows the “fourth branch” of government to act with the force of law while avoiding the ultimate accountability of the ballot box.

The only thing clear from this election’s results, as we see them right now, is that neither party has a clear mandate for a sweeping legislative agenda. Look forward to any administration utilizing these secondary tools (executive orders and rule making) to act on their own agendas. Are you preparing to act in those same structures to advance your own?

P.s. Checking In – What are your thoughts? Are you seeing any threats to your own agenda? Drop a comment below or on social media and let me know!

Special Election Edition: Coalition Building, Rule 2 – Win or Lose, Graciously

Chances are 50-50 that “your guy” is going to lose tomorrow.

Not literally, but let’s get real here. Anyone who tells you they know definitively how tomorrow’s general election will turn out is, more than likely, a shyster. Innumerable variables remain. At this point, we are predicting the outcome of an election based on a gut feeling – regardless of how well informed.

I’m confident in saying that because we all saw how it went down in 2016.

What we do know: someone will win, someone will lose, and you still have to advance your agenda thereafter.

HOW IT COULD GO DOWN

I’ll go ahead and put my own wager out there – with the caveat that I claim no special insight, and am prepared to be wrong. Therefore, after doling out such significant equivocation, I’ll go ahead and handicap the election in favor of a re-election of President Trump.

His victory path runs through the middle of the country where he is surging late. With so much discussion this year of absentee balloting and increased turnouts in early voting, analysts continue to ignore that both parties are cannibalizing their election day turnout for those early votes. I think this late surge is likely to decide Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania in President Trump’s favor.

To get in the weeds – and sticking to Ohio – there are more than 1 million voters who went to the polls in 2016 and 2018 who have not voted early or requested an absentee ballot. Of those million+ voters, a significant edge is held by the GOP.

Significantly absent from this election has been a sense of energy on the side of Vice President Biden despite his credentials and a lifetime of service to his nation. The languid nature of the campaign is difficult for me to capture as a “quiet majority.”

BUT WHAT DOES IT REALLY MATTER?

Here’s the rub. No matter what happens in tomorrow’s election, and regardless of how long it takes for results to finalize, about half of the country will be inconsolable, and the other half will be exuberant.

Win or lose, you’ll have to get back to the advocacy game quickly. You’ll have new members of state and federal delegations to engage. You’ll have advocates to thank and begin educating rapidly. And you’ll have a political action plan to begin developing.

Through November, I plan on highlighting some of these activities in regular posts. I hope we’ll have a broader conversation about how to be successful in whatever environment develops in the next 24 hours (assuming results get tabulated efficiently). I hope you’ll check back in for those posts and share your thoughts as we go along.

THE BEST PATH FORWARD

Professional advocates have trained to detach themselves from the results of any particular election. It’s much harder for activists and volunteers to do so – especially if your team comes up short. So, I’ll share some advice from our 16th President who, as you know, dealt with a special level of national division.

Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?’

Abraham Lincoln

We are inclined to think of Lincoln addressing the rift in the Union – neglecting the importance of the bridge building he had to do within his own political party. The early Republican party, after all, was a broad, diverse coalition. Several factions vied for the nomination, and Lincoln came out on top despite political giants standing in his way. But did he cast those giants to the side? Hardly – no, he built them into his cabinet.

There’s a lesson in that nugget for us as advocates. Chances are, our volunteers come from varied political paradigms. You owe it to your agenda to put a check on your own view of this election. Regardless of who wins, it’s already in the rearview mirror.

Starting right now, not waiting for the results, show grace to your team. Show grace to candidates in contested races – half of whom won’t win. Show grace, warmth, and value to those you’ll need in the next session of congress, your state legislature, or city council meeting. Find ways to re-engage them as part of your team.

We owe it to our own causes to realize that elections are finite, but advocacy is an infinite game – and one we have to keep playing regardless of one cycle. Win or lose, graciously.

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK?

I’d love to hear your predictions. Comment below, but keep it civil! This blog is NOT about politics, it’s about advocacy – so, if you want to avoid a prediction, maybe share what you are doing to prepare for the various environments that will develop from the results. Regardless, I’d like to hear from you! How are you planning on being part of what’s possible after tomorrow?

Octob-Her: A lasting lesson in soft advocacy

Those who’ve taken a moment to read the home page of this site will stumble upon a quote at the very bottom from my favorite President, Calvin Coolidge. The quote captures the core concept of this blog, that there is always something we can do to advance our causes. As I write this final installment in the Octob-her series focused on women in advocacy, I thought it would be fitting to share a bit of history about President Coolidge’s wife, Grace and her lasting lesson in the role of soft advocacy.

In modern politics, we’ve become accustomed to an activist/advocate role for First Ladies (and someday, a First Gentlemen) that we can expect to carry forward as successive spouses identify causes they can advance through the influence of that particular station. But this was not always the historical norm. Prior to Eleanor Roosevelt, advocacy from the personages within the first family was exceedingly rare. Grace Coolidge was one of the first to take an interest in the history of the preceding first ladies and once bemoaned the lack of material available on her predecessors and their activities.

In many ways, Grace adhered to the precedent laid out before her, drawing distinctions between her role in managing the personal staff of the White House and her own inclinations on involvement in public policy. Strategically, however, she was an early interpreter of how modern media (radio, early video reels) could be leveraged to appeal to the broader public without a direct call for action.

In 1924, after assuming the Presidency in the wake of Warren G. Harding’s death, Coolidge was seeking election to the office in his own right. The campaign was challenging on a deeply personal level due to the July 1924 death of the Coolidges’ son, Calvin. In the midst of her own mourning and bolstering her taciturn husband, Grace used her office to reinforce the importance of women participating in voting. In a non-partisan event, she filled out her personal absentee ballot on the South Lawn of the White House grounds while the press photographed her in the act. This simple, lead-from-the-front gesture was an early example of her mastery of soft advocacy.

In a time when the vote was still new, and in some ways unfathomable, to women across the country, Grace found a way to elevate awareness in a way that testifies to the power of pursuing what is possible.

But she didn’t stop there.

Prior to marrying “Silent Cal”, Grace served as a teacher at the Clarke School for the Deaf in Massachusetts. According to an online biography available through firstladies.org, Grace steered clear of using the station of First Lady to become a spokesperson for the Clarke school. Yet, public knowledge of her past as an educator for the hearing-impaired drew attention to the issue – as we would undoubtedly expect in the age of modern media.

In one event, without an overt ask presented to the public, Grace Coolidge and Helen Keller brought the dilemma of hearing and sight impairment to the forefront of the national consciousness.

First Lady, Grace Coolidge allowing Helen Keller to “lip-read” by touch. (Library of Congress)

As always, a picture is worth a thousand words. Above, you see Grace Coolidge allowing the visually and aurally impaired Keller to read her lips in, I believe, one of the most intimate examples of empathy ever demonstrated on the national stage. This one moment, captured for posterity through the press corps, spread across the country in an early demonstration of what it means to go viral.

I was never taught about Grace Coolidge in school. The Coolidge administration as a whole is largely overlooked when classes turn to the broader topics of the time such as prohibition and the, by puritan standards, lasciviousness of the 1920’s. But here, in the midst of all that made the ’20s “roaring”, we have a soft, quiet moment captured solely through silent imagery, that conveys a clear message of humanity and decency.

Despite her restrained activism, Grace’s soft touch inspired a nation. She was a tremendously popular public persona throughout Cal’s time in office. Quietly, and with a clear separation between her role as First Lady and her personal life, she raised more than $2,000,000 toward an endowment for her former employer, the Clarke School for the Deaf. Converted to today’s dollars that’s more than $30 million.

Dollars are easy to capture as a metric, but how much more priceless is the impact of bringing the challenges of physical disability to the national stage, and demonstrating such…grace.

I’m floored by this story. There is much more to learn about Grace Coolidge, and I’d encourage you to look her up. She was renowned for her sense of style and her approachable demeanor. More importantly, I think we can all learn a little more about how to succeed as advocates if we remember the power of a soft touch in advocacy.

In today’s politics, bombast seems to win the day. I remain hopeful and trust the pendulum will swing back toward decorum in public life – but that starts with each of us. If enough of us commit to being just a little bit better, we’ll push that pendulum a little further, a little faster. After all, circumstance may not allow us do do everything at once, but we can always do something at once.

Give me some space

Nothing personal, but I need a little space.

So you’re getting subjected to a special post today about some of the bright spots of 2020. Yeah, go ahead and read that again – there are some bright spots! Take a moment to look up, literally.

Mars or Bust

Summer 2020 brought us an optimal launch window for missions to Mars. And while we are still some time away from a human mission to Mars, our little robot friends are going to be very active come February 2021. Three separate missions launched during the July 2020 window and are all expected to reach their ultimate destination in a few months.

This year, NASA launched the Mars 2020 mission. The flight included the Perseverance rover and a first-of-its-kind helicopter, dubbed Ingenuity, designed for the thin atmosphere of the red planet. This team will work to collect samples that, for the first time, will be stored with the express purpose of eventual return to Earth via a separate mission.

But we aren’t the only nation headed to Mars in 2020. Both China and the United Arab Emirates are en route. China’s Tianwen-1 includes an orbiter, lander and rover utilizing a homebuilt delivery vehicle (their first). The UAE hitched a ride on a Japanese orbital launch to send their Hope orbiter to study seasonal patterns.

Rovers and probes lack the romanticism of human space flight – but each of these missions is helping us grow our knowledge base as we stretch further into the solar system in the coming generations. Perseverance’s sample collecting mission is a clarion call to American politicians to support future missions – especially crewed missions – in a way that builds on the successful advances we’ve seen through commercial endeavors and NASA’s re-prioritization of missions beyond Low-Earth Orbit (LEO).

Human Missions

But LEO is where we are still thriving in research and development – and this year’s activity on the International Space Station (ISS) has not disappointed. If you’re like me, you spent an entire day glued to the television when SpaceX launched Demo Mission 1 (Demo-1) earlier this year – the first time a private company has launched astronauts to the ISS and returned them safely to Earth. Accomplishing what many thought would never. be done, a private company returned human space flight to American soil for the first time since the end of the Shuttle program in 2011.

If you’re not like me, and you didn’t spend that entire day celebrating the free market in action, here’s a peek at my daughter celebrating the occasion in style:

Since Demo-1, the US and Russia have exchanged crew members on the ISS via the Russian Soyuz space craft, allowing Expedition Crew 64 to extend the continuity of human presence in orbit. On November 2nd, this crew will pass the 20 year mark for consecutive human presence in space. The station, significantly outlasting its planned lifespan, continues to grow our understanding of what it will take to live and work in space long term (ahem, Mars missions).

Rocket Development

But we won’t get to pack our bags for Mars quite yet – just give it about 10 years. Does that seem aggressive? Not if you ask the folks at SpaceX.

The Hawthorne, CA based company is continuing a rapid development of Starship, its next generation of reusable orbital craft that will more than quadruple the cargo capacity of the reliable Falcon 9. The Falcon series just completed its 100th successful launch since 2008. Twelve years into orbital flights and SpaceX has almost caught up to the total launches of the shuttle program (135 over 30 years). Starship will be a significant leap forward because it will dramatically increase supplies available to future missions to the Moon and Mars.

If this isn’t getting you excited, let’s talk about the NASA/SpaceX partnership moving forward. It boils down to contracts that are the natural evolution from the commercial resupply program launched by NASA and brought to reality in the past decade. SpaceX will be providing logistical support to the Artemis program, NASA’s renewed push for providing a longterm footprint on and around the moon including Gateway. This orbiting station will allow for long duration lunar orbit missions and landing capability for extended science operations on the lunar surface (AWESOME).

So what will SpaceX’s role be? First, reusable launch capability through the Falcon and Starship platforms. Through reusability, SpaceX has dramatically reduced launch expenses. Secondly, they are building a Starship concept vehicle that will allow Starship to serve as a refueling platform for missions to the Moon and Mars. Finally, they’ve been awarded contracts to provide logistics support (transportation to lunar orbit) and a human lander concept (Starship) as part of the Artemis program.

Artemis is our next stepping stone into the deeper solar system. And while I could go on, and on, and on about everything that’s exciting me about spaceflight, it’s time I let you return to Earth.

2020 continues to pose challenges for all of us. But, we sell ourselves short when we fail to recognize the good happening all around us. Much like the days of the Apollo program, our generation is poised to witness something remarkable in the coming years. Our universe is about to get smaller. I’m hoping my daughter will continue to glance upwards to the stars like she’s starting to these days. If nothing else, it will give years like 2020 a bit of perspective.

In the grand scheme of things, we’ve barely stretched our legs in human spaceflight. It’s difficult to capture mentally just how monumental a human mission to Mars would be. But let’s put it on the same scale as Columbus landing in the Caribbean. By that scale, where Mars represents San Salvador Island and Kennedy Space Center is Spain circa 1492, we’ve only sailed about 2.5 miles off the Spanish shore. We’re at the very start of this golden age of human exploration, don’t miss it, make sure to look up every once in a while.

Octob-her Continued: Legislative Staff with a Long View

There are a lot of women on Capitol Hill these days. Many focus on the number of women holding office in both the Senate and the House – as they should. But just as important are the countless career women who have stormed the hill in recent years and assumed roles as legislative directors, chiefs of staff, and committee counsels. If you walk the halls of congressional office buildings (when we re-open post-COVID that is) you’ll see that, often, the decision makers driving national policy development are whip smart, highly driven, 20 and 30 something women who know they are carrying an immense burden in public service.

The Ohio delegation is especially blessed in this arena. Because it’s an election year, I’m not going to focus on a single office or name staffers, but you should know that the staffer I’m about to describe to you would fit in any role across any of our delegation’s legislative teams. She is, frankly, a hard hitting, no BS leader whose actions in one realm reflect an incredibly important lesson: you owe it to your team to invest in your own replacement.

More than anything she conveyed in her base of policy knowledge (and trust me it is voluminous), this staffer – let’s call her Staffer 1 – has made a point to demonstrate the need to mentor her teammates at every stage of their respective careers. And her reasoning is simple, turnover on the Hill is incredibly high, and each of those mentees will one day be in a position to help your agenda.

This is that common thread you’ll see time and again on this blog; advocacy is relationship building and relationship building is a long game. But, let’s drill down into what that means for Staffer 1’s work on the Hill.

In addition to managing her specific issue portfolio, Staffer 1’s leadership role within the legislative team gives her oversight of everyone on the team. She becomes the funnel of information from the staff to the member, and has to depend on those teammates to prepare her as much as she prepares the member. This requires developing her subordinates to a point that they anticipate the member’s and her needs and deliver in an incredibly rapid-evolving environment.

Session days on the Hill are intense. Staffer 1 will be in 5-15 minute meetings for the entirety of a 16 hour day. In between those rapid fire sessions, she’ll be preparing the member for votes and dealing with caucus leadership. At any point, she needs to be prepared to return to the member’s side for decisions that are happening in real time. Needless to say, it’s overwhelming, thus the high turnover rate.

But what has made Staffer 1 different in her time as a leader? She’s used the non-session days for constructive recovery and planning. Not just playing catch up, because you never really do, but looking for opportunities to train her team to understand her thought process, develop a common understanding of her and the member’s goals, and allowing those staffers to step out of their comfort zones and fail.

What has been the effect of this approach? She’s developed a vast network of current and former staffers who 1) trust her; 2) support her member’s agenda; and 3) can execute their own members’ agendas more successfully.

How does she do it?

Annual Training: she consciously invests in staff development through an annual retreat that provides training removed from the stressors of daily legislative work. No matter how long your team has been together, these retreats allow you to re-assess priorities and re-evaluate your political action plan (I’ll be talking about action plans in November).

Strategic Planning & Scheduling: she sets realistic goals built around the congressional calendar to accomplish measurable outcomes: X number of co-sponsors on a piece of legislation; thoughtfully timed communication that drives the member’s message instead of reacting to circumstance; participation in networking events with key stakeholder groups. These are generic examples, but they point to helping her team develop habits of reaching outside of their immediate circle and prompting opportunities to discuss the members’ agenda.

There is nothing earth shattering about either of these core concepts. What makes the wave is that she intentionally executes both and reinforces the importance of them with her team. They become pillars of the staff dynamic. And when you can get a team to execute brilliantly in the basics like she does, they become immeasurably more impactful. You’d be baffled to know just how many teams fail to do this.

The beauty of both is that they are immediately transferrable to your own advocacy program. You too need to set time intentionally to create space for your team to train together, including cross-training in knowledge areas. Train your team to do each other’s jobs and eventually they’ll be training to your level. Those core competencies will not go away, and you’ll find you’ve created a truly effective advocacy nucleus for your organization.

When I’ve spoken with Staffer 1 about her approach, and why she’s so intentional, her responses are reminiscent of a character from the West Wing. “I’m only here and able to do what I do for so long. The people back home need help, and if I’ve got a great team, we can do more in two years together than we may ever accomplish in life after the Hill.”

Invest in your people. Train them to replace you. Your advocacy will outlast you.

Coalition Building, Rule 1 – Help Others

I’ve spent the last couple of hours in conversations with folks who are frustrated because they feel limited in their options to effect change right now. I get it. We’re in the part of our political cycle where the general election steals attention away from the long game of advocacy.

However, there are still things we can do right now that will lay the groundwork for effective advocacy in the future. Today, we should be working on building our coalition. Building can mean educating our members, or providing them more tools of the trade, but most often it’s about growing our ranks.

Right now, let’s focus on sheer numbers. How do we grow our advocacy networks? One tactic you can leverage right now is taking action on behalf of those whose interests align with your organization’s.

Act is not a passive verb. There are immediate steps you can take to build good will within your network. And in modern advocacy, powered by the data economy, those steps are easy and accessible to all. But, as you consider this tactic, understand that you are committing to the long game of relationship building.

First – do your homework on the agenda items of advocates in your network. I’m in the agriculture sphere, but work extensively on energy issues, technology and broadband issues, tax policy, and environmental policy. In the midst of my own priorities, I work to identify groups with overlapping interests and endeavor to identify opportunities where we can further their efforts in ways that don’t conflict with our own interest.

It boils down to the old 80/20 rule. If someone agrees with me 80% of the time, that doesn’t make them my enemy 20% of the time.

(I’ll get you started with a shameless little plug for one of my top priorities, which you can learn about HERE.)

Second – identify a specific initiative they are working on right now, and help amplify their message. In today’s world, individuals often default to the social media sharing approach. But this is a passive approach. If you want to stand out in their efforts, participate in their formal calls-to-action then personally ask your network to do the same.

Within my own operations, we leverage a voter activation tool that allows folks visiting our website to send form letter emails to their legislators on any active campaign we are pursuing at the time. Social media likes and shares are fine for educating your network, but when push comes to shove advocacy organizations need you to participate in their formalized messaging. So, on their active campaigns take the 1-2 minutes necessary to add your name to their petition or send their form letter email to your representative. You’ll probably be surprised how easy it is to participate in the system.

Lastly – follow up. Modern technology lets professional advocates know when you’ve taken action on their cause. But if you want to stand out for having helped advance a cause, make sure to circle back with that team. Give it a few days – almost like waiting to call after a first date – and send a note to the organizational contact. Ask them how the campaign is going and if there is anything further you can do.

BUT – and this is a big but – you have to be genuine and humble, not seeking a quid pro quo. You must be willing, as you’re growing your own advocacy team, to give with out asking. By genuinely contributing to their efforts, you are placing them ahead of yourself, engendering good will and helping you build an infinite game mindset.

When we help others, we are in a very real sense helping ourselves. Consistently, this industry boils down to relationship building. You’ll hear this from me regularly because it’s the single most important concept to effective advocacy.

If you want a first step into building this approach into a habit, I’d invite you to check out an ongoing campaign I have in my own work. Follow this link and you can take action to support a bill my organization is working to get carried into the next Congress. If you think it aligns with your own goals, please take a moment and take action with me. Then, make sure to send me an email, drop a comment on this blog, or connect with me about it on LinkedIn. I’d be grateful for the opportunity to learn more about your own priorities and how we can work together in the future.

The Go-To

Last week, I kicked off a series featuring women in advocacy. Anne Thompson brought her insights in the realm of managing a national Political Action Committee, and I hope you enjoyed hearing from one of the real go-getters in this field.

But, this week, I want to share a little bit with you about the Go-To. A poorly kept secret about most political teams is that they have a short list of volunteers, activists and community leaders they can count on in a pinch. In a sprawling congressional district, they may have multiple per county or community. Regardless of depth, every political operation is dependent on this bench.

In my own work, I knew I could count on several folks to answer the phone when I called – most of whom were all but guaranteed to take action. But, even in this crew there were still those who stood out. And at the risk of inadvertently alienating others, I’m going to tell you about one of those remarkable volunteers this week. She is by no means the only go-to I’ve worked with – but she is a dear friend who has taught me a lot about local politics, and I think she deserves some thanks.

I first met April Gibson during the 2012 election cycle, shortly after congressional re-districting happened in Ohio. My boss at the time was running for election in the new boundaries which nearly doubled the size of the previous congressional district. It became immediately apparent in that election cycle that we would need key leaders across the new district lines to help us grow name recognition and identify key campaign targets.

Overnight, April became a go-to for me and our whole team. How did she become so intertwined with our efforts? She gave without asking.

Let’s lay out what that means in practical terms:

– She identified key groups of influential local voters and community influencers we should prioritize engaging.

– She organized opportunities for our team to participate in existing events, maximizing visibility without creating additional work.

– She showed up. Every. Time.

– She offered local insights in a constructive way that built trust.

– She actively looked for alignment between the candidate’s goals and her own, finding ways to work on multiple issues while placing her limited asks strategically.

As a young, green staffer April quickly became a sounding board on any issue under the sun. She became a gut check on my assumptions, and helped reframe my approach to coalition building. In military terminology, she had my six – watching my blindspots to ensure we presented the candidate effectively and avoided committing a faux pas that can hurt a candidate in unfamiliar territory.

In the years since we worked directly together on campaigns, April and I have continued to stay in touch. She continues to work diligently on the causes that drive her. She continues to motivate those around her. She continues to mentor.

The Go-To’s, as you’ll see in your own work, have developed a habitual approach to advocacy work. It’s not a novel hobby they take part in every election cycle. Rather, they commit to relationship building and just causes that motivate them year round. It’s rarely glamorous work, but it moves the needle on a generational scale – and it takes habit building. And more often than not, you don’t have to ask them to be building these habits.

As you continue to grow your volunteer advocate network, get yourself an April. Look for the following:

– Who shows up?

– Who is already taking action that overlaps with your organizational goals?

– Who is in the habit of building connections between groups?

If you can find those three in one person, abundantly, I’ll bet you’re well on your way to establishing your own Go-To.

As for me, I’m forever grateful to the volunteers who worked so hard alongside our team. To all of them, and especially my dear friend April, thank you. Your friendship, and the lessons you taught along the way, made all the difference.

An Open Letter to My Politibros

When I walked into my local gym this morning, the last thing I thought I’d be hearing over the next hour would be a heated discussion over electoral politics.

I go to a no-frills, local gym frequented by those who spend time actually working out, not just taking mirror-selfies. Rarely, oh so rarely, do I hear discussion outside the norm – comparisons of lifting techniques, supplement use or competitive banter. Today, I expected no different. But in the world of modern politics, even this safe haven has been sacrificed to the gods of rhetoric.

As I was proceeding through my routine, two regulars – and exemplary models of the gym bro persona – began to have an open dialogue about the inherent value of an individuals vote. I’ll spare you the full content, but it went something like this:

GB1 – “Bruh, I’m not happy with either Trump or Biden, I think I”m going to vote for _______.”

GB2 – “You serious man? That’s just throwing your vote away.”

GB1 – “I don’t know. Neither of them gets it, and I think _______ has better ideas.”

-AND THEN ENTERS GYM BRO 3-

GB3 – “You can’t do that man. That’s just guaranteeing a win for _______.”

HOLD UP – Time to hear why this is under my skin today. I think we can trace a lot of the frustrations of modern politics back to the mindset embodied by this conversation. And it boils down to this: When we buy into the zero sum mindset of partisan politics, we abdicate our own responsibility to own the value of our vote.

Major political parties are massive machines, and in modern times they are highly driven by data. The minutiae captured by their voter tracking would astound you. And while impressive, it has led to a mindset wherein party operatives make a massive assumption over whether you, an individual voter, are one of their voters or the other party’s. Defaulting to this us vs. them mentality is dangerous enough, but more insidious is the laziness that it instills in us, the voting public.

Your vote does not belong to a political party or a candidate. Your vote belongs to you.

Don’t take me the wrong way. My entire adult life I’ve been engaged in party politics. Parties help amplify your own voice. But in that time, I’ve tried to keep perspective on the value of my vote. When you select a name on a ballot, you are – albeit privately – putting your name beside theirs as a representation of how you believe the government should be managed.

If neither party’s candidate in a given race aligns with your vision of the role of government, they should not be rewarded through zero sum analysis.

We have to move past the mindset in politics that a vote is for our guy or against the other guy. We have to move past the guy period. Your vote is your values; act accordingly.

So, to my gym…er…politibros this morning – I hope you’ll take ownership of your vote. It will be one step closer for all of us doing the same. And maybe, just maybe, we can bring a little more responsibility and civility back into the mix.